PROJECTS / Action>Reaction

   

The psychology behind the physical or digital button is quite simple. From remote controls to doorbells, we are used to pressing buttons and getting a reward as a result: the television turns on, letters appear on your computer screen, or a friend opens the door. Pushing a button makes something (positive) happen, which is what makes the act irresistible. Even in our digital environment, buttons give us instant rewards. For example, opening new messages or getting likes on our social media channels gives us a positive affirmation of our social status.

 

But what if a button referred to nothing other than itself, and you could only activate that button with impressions? With his installation ‘Action>Reaction 2.0’, Sjimmie Veenhuis demonstrates how refreshing it can be to give something like a button, which is ultimately a ‘mediator’ between us and all kinds of technology, a different meaning. The work consists of a large screen with around 1,000 buttons that, after they have been pressed – because yes, they’re really asking for it – light up in a variety of different colours like single pixels. Veenhuis invites viewers to 

consider the patterns they can create with these pixels and how they could even work with someone else to create something spectacular. While buttons are the focus of this artwork, Veenhuis has highlighted books, warning tape and traffic signs in his other installations. He uses these everyday objects in their original form but transforms them through the formation of patterns. It’s up to you to determine whether it’s just about the playful act of creating patterns in ‘Action>Reaction 2.0’ or whether there’s a hidden system behind the artwork. [1]

“With Action>Reaction, I playfully invert the relationship between myself as an artist, and the visitor,” Veenhuis explains. “This inversion is a result of the commission itself, which stated that the piece had to incorporate an interactive element. I thought of this stipulation as being quite challenging, initially, as art is interactive by its very nature. Eventually, I formed the idea to use an on­and­off switch. As a symbol for interaction. By removing the reference of these switches to turning the function of a device either on or off, as is usual, the switches suddenly refer only to their own inherent function. In a sense, they do not switch anything on or off other than them­ selves. And through that choice, the inversion of ‘creator’ and ‘beholder’ was established in one simple movement. That idea made me very enthusiastic.”

The concept of Action>Reaction is to allow visitors to control a series of on-and-­off switches. Their actions cause particular light patterns to appear, changing shape with each and every decision they make. You never know what’s going to happen. This way, one can not only create their own artwork, but also alter that of another.

Although Veenhuis knows exactly how the interactive piece itself should perform, he is more cautious when it comes to reactions of the public. What does he hope to achieve? Is it his intention to provoke certain thoughts in the minds of the public? To learn how to play?

“I have no expectations of what the public will do, the piece can have a multitude of meanings within its form and context. I would have no problem seeing it being

 

used as a playful attraction, as this outcome is inherent to a commission for an interactive installation. But to me personally, the work does deal with a certain subject matter. To me, the work symbolizes our increasing ‘on­demand’ culture, in which we take for granted the fact that we always have everything available to us. As such, Action>Reaction is a concrete, and literally tangible, reflection of the dominant mechanism which prescribes that everything we could wish for is made available at the simple touch of a button.” [2]